| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservation by Coupled EvolutionThe cis-acting sequences of RNA viruses are very well conserved. The following presents a model for the mechanism whereby they remain so well conserved. The model: Coupled evolutionSuppose that the specificity of recognition is determined by a host protein. The host protein evolves at very much slower rates and remains unchanged for relatively long time spans. The virus, however, mutates at high rates, such that the cis-acting sequence is rapidly selected to achieve an optimal interaction with the host protein. Once this occurs, most mutations in the cis-acting sequence will be sub-optimal, and be selected against. Thus, the cis-acting sequence will now evolve only at a rate comparable to the cognate host protein.
PredictionsThe model makes 2 strong predictions.
The available evidence support both predictions. The conserved 'wildtype' sequence is optimalAlthough RNA viruses have high mutation rates, the predominant or wildtype genome persists with remarkable stability during passaging in culture. This is true even though substantial numbers of mutants are detectable at each passage (for examples, see Domingo, et al., 1978; Steinhauer and Holland, 1987). To reconcile this apparent paradox, it was proposed that the relevant sequences are quickly optimized when environmental conditions change (e.g., adaptation to culture) resulting in a predominant, wildtype sequence [Steinhauer and Holland, 1987]. The wildtype sequence persists because, among the distribution of mutants generated during virus growth, none have a competitive advantage over the wildtype, so long as the environmental conditions remain stable [Steinhauer and Holland, 1987]. The initial optimization process is likely to be facilitated by the high mutation rates and large population sizes that generate an enormous diversity for selection to operate upon efficiently. When the environmental conditions are altered, some other sequence might be selectively advantageous, and it becomes the dominant species, superior to most of the mutants that arise. This explanation for the persistence of the wildtype in culture may be generalized to evolution in nature: As the viruses diverge over time, to adapt to disparate niches or environmental conditions, only those features that are the most strongly selected for under a variety of environmental conditions will remain conserved. Hantaviruses provide an example of the conservation of the cis-acting sequences, despite the evolutionary divergence of many other properties of the viruses. Hantaviruses have been found in Asia (e.g., Hantaan virus, the type species), Europe (Puumala, Dobrova-Belgrade viruses), North America (Sin Nombre virus), and South America (Andes virus). They are found in Arctic to tropical environments, and they are vectored by different rodent species [Clement, et al., 1997; Schmaljohn and Hjelle, 1997]. Infection by the different viruses results in quite different severity and nature of clinical abnormalities in humans. The available data indicate that the RNA sequence of different strains of the same virus diverge by 0.1 to 1% per year, while differences between different hantavirus species are substantially greater, 20% or more [Hjelle, et al., 1995; Plyusnin, et al., 1996]. In contrast, the terminal sequences at the ends of the genome segments are very well conserved. These are presumed to be the cis-acting sequences for initiating viral RNA synthesis. The exact extent of the cis-acting sequences remains to be determined, but if they are comparable to that of the Rift Valley fever virus (13 nt; Prehaud, et al., 1997), then most of the cis-acting sequence is still absolutely conserved. Thus, despite the evolutionary divergence of the viruses, that presumably took place over many thousands of years [Schmaljohn and Hjelle, 1997], and adaptation to potentially quite different host environments, their cis-acting sequences have remained largely unchanged. In all that time, a very large number of mutants must have been generated. Any mutant that is superior to the wildtype should have had an opportunity to expand in numbers, to leave descendants that differ from the wildtype. Such sequences have not been found to date. This suggests that the wildtype cis-acting sequences had been optimized a long time ago, and have remained superior over the ensuing time and under all the environmental conditions encountered by the viruses. Similar arguments apply to the conservation of the cis-acting sequences of other RNA viruses. The notion that the wildtype sequence is optimal is sufficiently unusual that we sought experimental evidence to support or refute it. The strategy is simply to randomize a portion of the cis-acting sequence, to make a library of viruses that together contain all possible sequence in the region that was randomized. The viruses that grow best are then selected for by passaging the viruses through multiple infection cycles. The question is, does the wildtype sequence become enriched at the expense of mutants, finally to dominate the population? A 5-nt region of the Sindbis virus promoter was randomized, and the library of viruses was passaged in cultured insect or mammalian cells. In both cases, the wildtype sequence became the dominant sequence in the population within 2-4 infection cycles [Hertz and Huang, 1995; Hertz and Huang, 1995]. We conclude that the wildtype sequence is indeed better than any other sequence, at least in the 5-nt region examined. To test the generality of this conclusion, randomization of other regions of the promoter and other cis-acting sequences of Sindbis virus are in progress. The recognition of the cis-acting sequence is functionally conservedWhether the cis-acting sequence is recognized by a host or a viral protein, the model predicts that it should evolve quite slowly compared to most of the rest of the genome. If this is true, then the recognition of cis-acting sequences should be functionally conserved: the mechanism for recognizing the cis-acting sequence should not have diverged much, despite the divergence in many other properties of the viruses. We should expect that the cis-acting sequence of a given virus to be recognized efficiently by closely related viruses. In principle, the efficiency of recognition might vary, depending on exactly how much the cis-acting sequences have diverged. The following are some examples of the functional conservation of the cis-acting sequences.
In some instances, viruses were unable to recognize the cis-acting sequence of a related virus. This should not be surprising, since the cis-acting sequences are very well conserved, but not immutable. As discussed above, viable mutants should be produced at low frequencies during evolution, and become amplified over time. As the mutational events accumulate, the divergent viruses become less and less able to recognize each other's cis-acting sequences, i.e., functional conservation can and do break down over time. Implications for antiviral drug designThe conservation of the cis-acting sequences suggest that they may be good targets for antiviral drug inhibition. We might hope that as the cis-acting sequences are slow to change during evolution, they will also be slow to change when confronted with antiviral drug inhibition. If so, we may be able to design broad-spectrum drugs with much decreased rates of drug-resistance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||